tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414191992826199228.post4441994621799320080..comments2023-09-04T09:10:50.092-07:00Comments on Sowing Science: Cultivating Effective Science Communication: Do facts hurt science communication?Francie Muraski-Stotzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11489908956029000485noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414191992826199228.post-82561076606486806082016-09-25T10:33:23.821-07:002016-09-25T10:33:23.821-07:00Thank you, Aviv. I'm pleased that the post res...Thank you, Aviv. I'm pleased that the post resonates with you. You are right on target with the question of what this means for the practice of science communication. This question is one for which we'll be seeking answers for a long time, I think.Francie Muraski-Stotzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11489908956029000485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414191992826199228.post-88502315635496735412016-09-24T12:06:44.401-07:002016-09-24T12:06:44.401-07:00What an eloquent, succinct post. It seems that the...What an eloquent, succinct post. It seems that the "deficit model" of science communication is so intuitive and (ostensibly, for the large part) so wrong. But what does that mean for science communication practice? There are some ideas but figuring out how to implement them well has been puzzling a lot of researchers and practitioners, and is probably going to hurt lot of people's puzzlers for a long time...Avivhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18000100410486744059noreply@blogger.com